Reaktor blocks used with push 21/7/2024 ![]() ![]() My personal setup is constantly changing but I essentially have Live 10 running Push 2 and a BCF2000 (plus some tablets) on one machine, my MK and JAM (plus some tablets) running Maschine on another and MIDI and audio flowing both ways between them.Ableton Live is for sequencing and mixing. Push and Maschine are made for specific software and if you learn to use them that way, you can accomplish a lot but if you've never used them before, THERE WILL BE A LEARNING CURVE. There are controllers out there with more encoders, faders and pads and they will have the advantage of being able to be used will all software. If you will continue to use Cubase, unless you are ReWiring, loading as plugin or using JACK and Virtual MIDI, these points are moot. It has a more comprehensive sound library (not that Ableton's is lacking). It can be but you need to set up Virtual MIDI ports to and from the software to get anywhere near the same functionality Push has with the stock devices in Ableton. ![]() Sequencing is fine but not as robust or functional as Push. I also have a MK3 and with the Komplete library of instruments, effects and sounds, it is also awesome but in a different way. Add ClyphX and M4L and you can make it do anything you want. ![]() Not so much in arrangement without third party/user scripts. Especially for sound design and sequencing. I absolutely hate being stuck without it when I'm making music It does lots of stuff really well.Īgain, idk about maschine and mpc but push is A LOT more than just a sampler/grid of sample triggering pads. Its sequencers (both drum and melodic, but the drum sequencer is especially clutch), greater number of pads, scale modes, ability to lock to scale or play chromatically, guitar-like layout of pads in chromatic mode, ability to select samples from your hard drive and chop and sequence them quickly and easily, parameter locking/step automation, etc. ![]() So if I were going to encourage you to buy something like this, it would be to use as an instrument, and for that Push is phenomenal because of lots of things. And yes there are some things where turning knobs (automation) or using the Push to control Live (multiple quick fader adjustments) is very convenient but for the most part it's faster just to use a mouse and keyboard IMO. I don't know what the maschine workflow is like, but I can't imagine that there's practically anything out there as comprehensive as the Push for controlling your production environment. I know there are alot of youtube video etc, but there is not a conclusion with pro and con, but a lot say there that maschine is better and push the best Some people here who have compared mpc x and maschine mk3? Now i think buying a mpc x, because it works without pc, but do i have the same problems there with opening vst etc?Ībleton push looks nice too but im cubase user not ableton, i know you can rewire ableton in cubase but learn a ne DAW in cubase is to much for me now What i dont like too, is it dont works 100% standalone without pc, i was thinking it do ,but only standalone with pc or in DAW So my first question is, i have read in the maschine topic here, u can use try before buy vst plugins or these presets and kontakt librarys only with the maschine try before buy software,īut with the original maschine software it dotn works, thats true ? I just for fun bought a ni maschine mk3, but im not 100% happy with it, maybe 50%,īecause i only have my wav samples for it, the ni komplete11 select software dont works because i have alot of try before buy plugins, ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |